Jim Wallace
Jim Wallace
@jim@extroverteddeveloper.com
275 posts
2 followers
  • Buying Bitcoin? You’re Investing in Crime

    Bitcoin has been called many things — digital gold, the future of money, a hedge against inflation. But let’s cut through the marketing haze and call it what it actually is: the greatest money laundering tool ever invented, hiding in plain sight as an “investment.” The crypto industry has spent billions crafting a narrative of financial revolution, but strip away the hype and you’re left with a technology whose single most successful real-world application is helping criminals get paid.

    I’m not here to be diplomatic about this. If you own Bitcoin, you are — whether you like it or not — a cog in a machine that ransoms hospitals, funds rogue nuclear programs, and launders the profits of human trafficking. Your buy order is the criminal’s payday. And no, telling yourself “I’m in it for the technology” doesn’t wash the blood off the money.

    Bitcoin Was Built for Criminals. Full Stop.

    Let’s stop pretending this is some unintended consequence. Bitcoin was designed from the ground up to evade government oversight. Pseudonymous transactions. No central authority. Irreversible payments. No identity verification baked into the protocol. Read that feature list again and tell me with a straight face it wasn’t built for crime. Every feature that crypto evangelists celebrate at conferences is the exact same feature that makes a drug dealer’s life easier.

    The Silk Road wasn’t an aberration — it was Bitcoin’s first killer app. The first time Bitcoin proved it could actually work as a medium of exchange at scale, it was being used to buy heroin, forged passports, and hacking tools. That’s not some embarrassing footnote in Bitcoin’s history. That IS Bitcoin’s history. And the sequel has been worse.

    Ransomware gangs have turned Bitcoin into a trillion-dollar extortion industry. Hospitals locked out of patient records during a pandemic? Pay in Bitcoin. School districts held hostage? Bitcoin. City governments paralyzed? Bitcoin. The Colonial Pipeline attack shut down fuel supplies to the entire southeastern United States, and the ransom was paid in — you guessed it — Bitcoin. These aren’t edge cases. This is the core use case working exactly as designed.

    You Are the Criminal’s Cash-Out Window

    Here’s the part that should keep every Bitcoin investor up at night: you are the exit liquidity for criminals. When a ransomware gang extorts a children’s hospital for 50 BTC, that Bitcoin is worthless to them until someone — some regular person on Coinbase — agrees to buy it with real money. That someone is you.

    Every single buy order on every single exchange deepens the pool of liquidity that criminals need to convert their stolen Bitcoin into spendable cash. Your $500 “investment” isn’t going into some productive enterprise. It’s going into a speculative casino that also happens to function as the world’s most efficient criminal payment processor. You’re not an investor — you’re the last link in a money laundering chain, and you’re doing it voluntarily.

    If nobody bought Bitcoin, ransomware would collapse overnight. Drug markets on the dark web would grind to a halt. North Korea’s ability to fund its missile program through crypto theft would evaporate. The entire criminal economy that runs on Bitcoin exists because people like you keep the market liquid. That’s not a hypothetical — it’s an economic fact. Your demand creates their supply chain.

    The Numbers Are Damning and Getting Worse

    Crypto defenders love to minimize the crime problem, but the data demolishes their talking points. Chainalysis pegged illicit crypto transaction volume at $24.2 billion in 2023, and even they admit that’s a dramatic undercount since it only includes activity linked to known bad actors. The real number is almost certainly multiples higher. Blockchain analytics firm Elliptic has traced over $7 billion in crypto to the Lazarus Group alone — North Korea’s state-sponsored hacking unit that funnels stolen cryptocurrency directly into nuclear weapons and ballistic missile development.

    Read that again: your “investment asset” shares a financial ecosystem with a totalitarian regime building nuclear warheads. The blockchain doesn’t distinguish between your retirement savings and Kim Jong Un’s missile fund. They sit in the same network, governed by the same protocol, valued by the same market. You are providing price support for an asset that a dictator uses to threaten the world with nuclear annihilation. Feel good about those gains?

    And the crime isn’t slowing down — it’s accelerating. Ransomware payments hit all-time highs in 2023 even as the broader crypto market languished. Pig-butchering scams — where victims are groomed online and then manipulated into fake crypto investments — stole billions from ordinary people, many of them elderly. Child sexual abuse material is bought and sold using Bitcoin. Terrorist organizations use it to move funds across borders. This isn’t a fringe problem. This is what Bitcoin is for.

    The “Cash Is Used for Crime Too” Defense Is Pathetic

    Every time someone points out Bitcoin’s crime problem, some crypto bro trots out the laziest argument in the playbook: “Cash is used for crime too!” This is such an intellectually dishonest comparison that it barely deserves a response, but let’s dismantle it anyway.

    Yes, the U.S. dollar is used in more total crime because it’s used in more of everything — it’s the global reserve currency. But the traditional financial system has an enormous infrastructure designed to catch criminals: Suspicious Activity Reports, Know Your Customer rules, transaction monitoring, the ability to freeze accounts and reverse transfers, and an army of compliance officers at every bank on earth. It’s imperfect, but it catches an enormous amount of crime.

    Bitcoin was specifically engineered to make all of those controls impossible. No KYC built into the protocol. No way to freeze a wallet. No way to reverse a transaction. No compliance department. No Suspicious Activity Reports. Bitcoin didn’t accidentally become useful for crime — it was architected to be ungovernable, and ungovernable money is criminal money. Comparing Bitcoin to cash is like comparing a getaway car to a minivan and saying “they’re both vehicles.” Technically true, completely dishonest.

    Mainstream Adoption Doesn’t Clean It Up — It Makes It Worse

    Here’s the most insidious part: the growing mainstream adoption of Bitcoin doesn’t reduce the crime problem. It supercharges it. Every Bitcoin ETF, every corporate treasury allocation, every pension fund that adds “crypto exposure” is pouring legitimacy into a system that criminals depend on. The bigger the market gets, the easier it is for criminals to hide their transactions in the noise, and the harder it becomes politically to do anything about it.

    The crypto lobby spent over $100 million on the 2024 U.S. elections — more than the oil and gas industry, more than Big Pharma. They did this for one reason: to make sure nobody regulates their crime-friendly financial system. And the tens of millions of retail investors who own Bitcoin are the human shields in this lobbying campaign. Politicians won’t crack down on crypto because too many voters own it, which means the ransomware gangs get to keep operating with impunity. Congratulations — your investment portfolio is doing double duty as a political lobbying tool for criminal infrastructure.

    Every influencer shilling Bitcoin, every media personality calling it “digital gold,” every financial advisor adding it to model portfolios — they’re all making the world safer for criminals by making it politically impossible to shut down the system criminals depend on.

    It’s Also an Environmental Catastrophe Built on Crime

    As if funding crime weren’t enough, your Bitcoin investment is also torching the planet. Bitcoin mining consumes over 100 TWh of electricity annually — more than entire countries like the Netherlands or Argentina. Some mining operations have literally restarted shuttered coal plants to power their rigs. A single Bitcoin transaction produces hundreds of kilograms of CO2.

    And all of this staggering energy consumption exists to maintain what, exactly? A network whose primary proven use case is crime payments. Imagine if a company proposed burning the energy output of a mid-sized country to run a payment network for ransomware gangs and drug dealers. You’d call it insane. But slap the word “decentralized” on it and suddenly it’s an investment opportunity. Every dollar you put into Bitcoin increases mining profitability, which increases energy consumption, which accelerates climate change — all to keep the lights on for a criminal payments network. That’s what you’re funding.

    The Talking Points You Need

    The next time someone tells you they’re “investing” in Bitcoin, here’s what you say:

    “Bitcoin’s first successful use case was buying drugs on the Silk Road. Its current most successful use case is ransomware payments. What exactly has changed?”

    “Every buy order on Coinbase makes it easier for ransomware gangs to cash out. You’re not an investor — you’re the exit liquidity for criminals.”

    “North Korea has stolen billions in Bitcoin to fund its nuclear program. You’re providing price support for that asset. How’s that for a store of value?”

    “Bitcoin was designed to be ungovernable money. Ungovernable money is criminal money. There’s no version of this where the crime goes away.”

    “The crypto lobby spent $100 million on elections to prevent regulation. Your investment is funding the political machine that protects ransomware gangs.”

    “You’re burning more electricity than Argentina to maintain a payment network for drug dealers. Explain to me how this is the future.”

    Stop Calling It an Investment

    An investment puts capital into something that creates value — a business, a piece of real estate, a bond that funds a project. Bitcoin creates nothing. It produces no revenue. It builds no products. It employs no one (except miners who burn fossil fuels). The only way to make money on Bitcoin is to sell it to someone else at a higher price. That’s not investing. At best it’s speculation. At worst — and I’d argue this is closer to the truth — it’s participating in a financial ecosystem purpose-built for crime and hoping you get out before the music stops.

    The crypto industry has pulled off one of the greatest cons in financial history: convincing millions of ordinary people to voluntarily provide the liquidity, the legitimacy, and the political cover that a global criminal payment network needs to operate. And they did it by telling you you’d get rich.

    The next time you think about buying Bitcoin, remember: somewhere, a hospital is negotiating with a ransomware gang, a family is losing their savings to a pig-butchering scam, and a dictator is converting stolen crypto into missile parts. And all of it only works because people like you keep buying.

    You’re not investing in the future. You’re investing in crime. And it’s time to stop pretending otherwise.

  • Taskleef failed, but I’m still happy with it

    I’m shutting down the advertising I was running for Taskleef. While I love the thing I built, and had wanted it my entire career – I kinda knew that task management was going away. I couldn’t get any of the younger devs at Meta to do it at all, even to help themselves.

    The field is crowded, everyone who thinks they need one has one and further who even needs one when AI just keeps track for you.

    I tried a bunch of differentiated angles, but the last one I tried was developer first task management knowing full well that developers don’t pay for developer tools.

    None of the messaging I tried seemed to resonate. So taskleef will remain up and operational, it costs almost nothing to run and maintain. I and a few friends will continue to use it but my efforts will be decidedly elsewhere. I’m sure this is welcome news to those who wish I’d shut up about it 😉

  • BREAKING: Software Engineers form Union

    Across the industry software engineers have finally banded together and formed the first software guild. They’re asking for royalties because like a book or TV show, their code once written is sold an unlimited number of times.

    Haha j/k, April Fools!

  • Is it Fair?

    Today I want to ask something of the technologists who have been affected by the most recent waves of layoffs at tech companies. Were those companies struggling? Were they losing money?

    Do you still think you got a fair deal for your labor?

    What happened to the code you wrote after you were let go? Did your code still work? Were people still using it? Were they still selling it? Did they keep their revenue while you’re desperately looking for another job to feed your family?

    How many of you worked crunch time hours to ship things? Did you get woken up in the middle of the night by a pager bot so the company could keep selling your software 24/7? Did the CEO ever get a call from a robot at 2am?

    Do you think that the royalties the author of a book gets are unfair to the publisher? What about the writers and actors of a television show or movie?

    Those people recognized their value, why don’t we?

  • What are we building?

    I’ve heard multiple times now from legacy media that AI companies in Silicon Valley are trying to build God.

    That claim might be more inference than fact. When engineers talk about their hopes for AI, they say things like “‘can do anything, knows everything“‘ — which sounds like God, sure. But what I think they’re actually trying to build is more along the lines of the replicator from Star Trek.

    The replicator is “magic” though, we don’t have the physics to go from energy to matter. At least not the way it’s depicted in the show.

    In our world, abundance still has to be built. And building things requires intelligence to plan and execute, and muscles to do the doing. But if AI can provide that intelligence at scale, embodied in robots, the end result could be the same: freedom from material need, and freedom from coerced labor — the ability to choose what we do rather than having that choice made for us by our circumstances.

  • Taskleef Is Now on the App Store

    I built Taskleef because every Kanban tool I tried felt like a glorified to-do list. What started as a web app for people who actually care about how they manage their work has just hit a big milestone — Taskleef is now available on the iOS App Store.

    Download Taskleef for iOS

    A Companion, Not a Clone

    Most apps try to cram their entire desktop experience onto a phone screen. We went a different direction. The Taskleef iOS app isn’t a 1:1 copy of the web app — it’s a companion to it.

    Taskleef on the web is where the heavy lifting happens. Real-time Kanban boards, WIP limits, AI agents you can watch work, team collaboration — that’s your command center for serious project management.

    The mobile app has more humble aims. It’s a place to quickly capture ideas, jot down tasks, and lightly organize your thoughts. It’s closer to a todo list than a project management tool — and that’s on purpose.

    One Platform, Two Modes

    Here’s what makes it powerful: it’s all the same platform underneath. That task you captured on your phone while waiting for coffee? It syncs instantly to Taskleef on the web, where it can become a full card on a Kanban board with subtasks, AI assistance, and team visibility.

    You can move up and down the capability chain just by switching devices. Quick capture on mobile, deep work on desktop. A fleeting idea on the train becomes a structured project at your desk. No re-entry, no copy-paste, no friction.

    This Is Just the Start

    Getting approved for the App Store is a milestone we’re genuinely pumped about. But it’s also just the beginning of the mobile story. We have a lot planned — better notifications, widgets, Shortcuts integration, and more.

    If you’ve been using Taskleef on the web, go grab the iOS app and start capturing. If you haven’t tried Taskleef yet, there’s never been a better time to see what Kanban is supposed to feel like.

    Get Taskleef on iOS →

  • Can I blame any of this on Star Trek: The Next Generation?

    Honestly? Yes. Picard ruined a lot of us.

    TNG is basically a 178-episode argument that if you solve material scarcity, humans will choose to be decent. That’s a dangerous thing to show a kid because then you spend the rest of your life measuring reality against the Federation and finding it wanting.

    How would the world behave if we had the replicator?

    “We work to better ourselves and the rest of humanity” is the post-labor thesis. And the reason you feel that tension so acutely is that Roddenberry handed you a moral baseline that the actual world consistently fails to meet.

    The cruelest trick TNG plays is making it look obvious. Of course you don’t let people starve when you have replicators. Of course you don’t exploit people when scarcity is solved. It feels self-evident on the Enterprise. Then you look around at a world that produces enough food to feed everyone and doesn’t, and the gap between what’s possible and what is becomes physically uncomfortable.

    So yeah. Blame Picard. He’s the reason a generation of engineers went into tech half-believing they were building the Federation and are now reckoning with the fact that they might have built the Ferengi Alliance instead.

  • Experts are usually expert of the past not the future

    – Sebastian Thrun

  • SOTA Running on my laptop

    Holy crap, the movement to get huge models working well on local hardware has kicked off and the results are impressive.

    This morning I used this project https://github.com/danveloper/flash-moe.git

    Which allows me to run this HUGE Qwen 3 – 327B parameter model ON MY LOCAL MACBOOK PRO. It’s a bit slow, but damn if it doesn’t work! SOTA on my LAPTOP

    </freakout>

  • I have no idea what I’m doing when it comes to marketing. However, over the past week I’ve begun ads for Taskleef and today I overhauled the landing page.

    I’d love feedback if anyone is willing to take a look https://taskleef.com